After waging a court battle in New York, trainer Bob Baffert's lawyers are poised to turn their attention to Kentucky.
The New York Times reported Jan. 10 it has obtained the draft of a complaint in which Baffert is threatening to sue Churchill Downs unless it lifts the two-year suspension handed down to Baffert last year after his Kentucky Derby Presented by Woodford Reserve (G1) winner Medina Spirit failed two post-race drug tests.
Due to that ban, horses trained by Baffert cannot race in or receive qualifying points for the upcoming Kentucky Derby and the Longines Kentucky Oaks (G1).
Though the complaint has yet to be filed, Bill Carstanjen, the CEO of Churchill Downs Inc., told the Times that his company was willing to face Baffert in court and might file a countersuit.
"This threatened lawsuit is yet another tactic from Mr. Baffert's well-worn playbook of obfuscating the facts, inventing excuses to explain positive drug tests and attempting to blame others to avoid responsibility for his own actions," he said in the report. "We are considering any and all legal options available to us to set the record straight and ensure Mr. Baffert is held accountable for all the reputational damage he has caused us. The irony is not lost on us that despite all of his violations, he is the one threatening to file lawsuits claiming to be aggrieved."
The Churchill Downs public relations staff also posted a Tweet saying, "CDI is committed to protecting the integrity and future of the racing industry—for the horses, our fans, our partners, our team members and the betting public. No one is above the rules, including Mr. Baffert, and we remain intent on holding him accountable for his actions."
In the Times report, Clark Brewster, an attorney for Baffert, said, "The complaint was sent as a centerpiece for discussion. It was intended to generate honest discussion and avoid litigation. There is nothing wrong with the complaint. The facts are in our corner. It has been rebuffed and they have invited litigation, and that's where we will be."
Given how Baffert responded quickly to the New York Racing Association's May 17 temporary suspension of the Hall of Fame trainer and filed for a temporary restraining order in federal court a month later, it has long been assumed that Baffert would also file suit against Churchill Downs.
Speculation over the delays in filing against Churchill Downs centers on the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission's lack of a final ruling on the drug tests and whether Medina Spirit should be disqualified and Baffert fined or suspended. That ruling figures to play a role in any impending court battle.
Though more than eight months have passed since the May 1 Run for the Roses, the results of a third and final test of Medina Spirit's post-race sample were only announced Dec. 3. Baffert's attorneys said that test, completed by New York Equine Drug Testing and Research Laboratory director Dr. George Maylin, confirmed that the betamethasone found in Medina Spirit's system came from a cream rather than an injection and the result of the Kentucky Derby should stand.
While Baffert was able to secure a July 14 restraining order in New York federal court that lifted the NYRA suspension, his attorneys will face a different challenge in Kentucky. Though Judge Carol Bagley Amon granted Baffert's request due to a lack of due process—which could also be the case with Churchill Downs—NYRA is considered a "state actor" which must adhere to a different set of legal criteria than Churchill Downs, which is owned by Churchill Downs Inc., a private entity.
Due to Judge Amon's ruling, NYRA revised its protocols for disciplinary hearings and Baffert is scheduled for a Jan. 24 hearing that could open the door for NYRA to re-impose the suspension.